[Spellyans] ree: gwiryoneth

Daniel Prohaska daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Fri Nov 19 15:13:46 GMT 2010


What do you think of my suggestion of using <v> for [v], <f> as an umbrella graph for [f] ~ [v] and <ff> for [f] only? It’s the third or fourth time I’ve mentioned it and you haven’t commented on it.

Dan

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Everson
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 11:42 AM



On 19 Nov 2010, at 08:19, Owen Cook wrote:

 

> On a not totally unrelated note, I would really like to see a return

> to the use of final <f> for /v/, final <ff> for /f/, which I thought

> was one of the most elegant features of an earlier incarnation of KS.

 

 

We compromised with KK by agreeing to -v in monosyllables, replacing the -f we used. Our compromise was made in good faith; I am satisfied that we do not need to renege on it. 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20101119/542dadde/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list