[Spellyans] ree: gwiryoneth
daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Fri Nov 19 15:13:46 GMT 2010
What do you think of my suggestion of using <v> for [v], <f> as an umbrella graph for [f] ~ [v] and <ff> for [f] only? It’s the third or fourth time I’ve mentioned it and you haven’t commented on it.
From: Michael Everson
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 11:42 AM
On 19 Nov 2010, at 08:19, Owen Cook wrote:
> On a not totally unrelated note, I would really like to see a return
> to the use of final <f> for /v/, final <ff> for /f/, which I thought
> was one of the most elegant features of an earlier incarnation of KS.
We compromised with KK by agreeing to -v in monosyllables, replacing the -f we used. Our compromise was made in good faith; I am satisfied that we do not need to renege on it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans