A. J. Trim
ajtrim at msn.com
Sat Nov 20 07:53:01 GMT 2010
I thought that you were recommending <dew> "two" for both masculine and
feminine. Has that changed?
I don't regard the difference as significant but some people believe that
there is a real difference between <iw> and <yw>. Perhaps we should
recommend that they write their supposed difference as <yu> and <yw>
Andrew J. Trim
From: nicholas williams
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 10:38 PM
To: Standard Cornish discussion list
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] iw
<iw> is not found in Cornish. It is therefore not justifiable at all.
One should write pyw 'who' and dyw 'two' (feminine); end of story.
<iw> is George's ideal based on Lhuyd, who actually wrote iu with a dot
under the u.
<iw> has no place in any traditionally based orthography for Cornish.
On 2010 Du 19, at 21:29, Michael Everson wrote:
> The distinction between <iw> (which is unattested in Cornish and is
> justifiable only by Breton <iv>) and <yw> is a fiction.
Spellyans mailing list
Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans