craig at agantavas.org
Sat Nov 20 14:34:29 GMT 2010
I think what Dan is saying here is that Ken is now, belatedly perhaps,
showing rather more willingness to revise his thoughts.
On 20 Du 2010, at 12:07, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 20 Nov 2010, at 11:38, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
>>> “You may find that it is not very difficult to do, if you look at
>>> the evidence. Recently, Ken George has changed his mind about
>>> final "s" as [ts]. And didn't he abandon "tj" and "dj" early on?
>>> And isn't he now abandoning "s" and "j" for "zh"”
>> Good on him for that!
> You are not, I trust, agreeing with George that [ˈwɔʒə] should
> replace [ˈwɔzə] and [ˈwɔdʒə].
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans