[Spellyans] <dh> ~ <th>

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Mon Nov 29 08:14:04 GMT 2010

Only if you want to see it.

On 2010 Du 29, at 04:34, Owen Cook wrote:

> They had also generalized the ending "au•dhak" for the first three.
> Given such a deformation in these numerals, the devoicing of the
> fricative in pemp•thak is hardly a shocker. The evidence I've seen for
> this number all seems to point, if anything, to /pempðek/.
> ~~Owen

More information about the Spellyans mailing list