On 10 Oct 2010, at 17:28, nicholas williams wrote: > The word is attested 11 times in BM, where it always has initial <on->. It appears as <vngrasshes> once in CW. > Perhaps we ought to spell it <ongrassyùs>. We have been spelling it ùn-; remember the discussion about ancoth > ùncoth? Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/