craig at agantavas.org
Wed Feb 2 16:30:39 GMT 2011
Sorry, Michael, but it WAS stated (very firmly) at the meeting at
"County" Hall after the AHG, at which I was present, and at which
copies of Albert & Ben's spec was made available. I'm sure Ray can
On 2 Whe 2011, at 16:19, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 2 Feb 2011, at 15:55, Craig Weatherhill wrote:
>> Michael, I think it's best not to assume there will be any review
>> after 2013. It was stated that it would be the one and only review.
> It was stated that there would not be any changes until after an
> initial five years. No statement was ever issued that it would be
> "the one and only review".
>> The reality may well turn out to differ but, for now, I think we
>> have no choice but to treat 2013 as though it will be the last
> Why? There is no guarantee that the SWF will be suitable for use
> after that review.
> KK was unsuitable for a variety of reasons and it was rightly
> criticized and so it was not chosen by the Commission. The SWF is
> unsuitable for a variety of reason and if its flaws are not put
> right it will attract sustained criticism from linguists.
> I do not second-guess what may happen in future and I recommend that
> nobody else does either.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans