[Spellyans] 'special'
A. J. Trim
ajtrim at msn.com
Thu Jul 28 00:02:58 BST 2011
I am happy with «specyally» but not with «spessly». The combination «-ssl-» does not appear to be authentically Cornish. Also, the «-s-» in «spesly» could represent “sh-” in “sheep” rather than “-ss” in “ass”.
Regards,
Andrew J. Trim
From: Daniel Prohaska
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:41 PM
To: 'Standard Cornish discussion list'
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] 'special'
PS: Just checked and <specyally> is actually attested, too, in TH.55.
Dan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From: spellyans-bounces at kernowek.net [mailto:spellyans-bounces at kernowek.net] On Behalf Of nicholas williams
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:05 PM
To: Standard Cornish discussion list
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] 'special'
Sorry, I forgot to include spesly BM 3695 and spesly BK 910.
If we write <spesly> people will pronounce the s as [z], but the forms with
c make it clear that the s is voiceless. Spessly seems a reasonable compromise.
On 2011 Gor 27, at 12:13, A. J. Trim wrote:
I agree with «specyal» but where do you find «spessly»? Your example says «specyly».
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Spellyans mailing list
Spellyans at kernowek.net
http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20110728/320c03af/attachment.htm>
More information about the Spellyans
mailing list