[Spellyans] worthy

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Fri Jul 15 14:11:16 IST 2011

I suspect that gwef is a back formation on the basis of the comparative. In *gwywha, *gwewha the -h- of the suffix devoiced the w, which
between vowels was pronounced as a bilabial [f]. From this the simplex gwef was extracted.


On 2011 Gor 15, at 13:49, Jon Mills wrote:

> If we consider the presence of final <-f> and <ff>, should the the final phoneme not be a fricative, /v/ ?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20110715/d54c4994/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list