[Spellyans] 'special'

A. J. Trim ajtrim at msn.com
Thu Jul 28 00:02:58 IST 2011


I am happy with «specyally» but not with «spessly». The combination «-ssl-» does not appear to be authentically Cornish. Also, the «-s-» in «spesly» could represent “sh-” in “sheep” rather than “-ss” in “ass”.


Regards,

Andrew J. Trim



From: Daniel Prohaska 
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 5:41 PM
To: 'Standard Cornish discussion list' 
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] 'special'

PS: Just checked and <specyally> is actually attested, too, in TH.55.

Dan 

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: spellyans-bounces at kernowek.net [mailto:spellyans-bounces at kernowek.net] On Behalf Of nicholas williams
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 2:05 PM
To: Standard Cornish discussion list
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] 'special'

 

Sorry, I forgot to include spesly BM 3695 and spesly BK 910.

If we write <spesly> people will pronounce the s as [z], but the forms with

c make it clear that the s is voiceless. Spessly seems a reasonable compromise.

 

 

On 2011 Gor 27, at 12:13, A. J. Trim wrote:





I agree with «specyal» but where do you find «spessly»? Your example says «specyly».

 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Spellyans mailing list
Spellyans at kernowek.net
http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20110728/320c03af/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list