deiniolabioan at gmail.com
Sun Jul 31 00:54:35 IST 2011
Nicholas Williams wrote:
> The verbal noun is interesting.
> We start with the IE root werg-, wreg- seen in English work, wrought
> and Gk ergon 'deed, work', earlier *wergon.
> In Brythonic an adjective *wregto- gives Cornish *gwreith,* gwreyth.
> This loses the gr in the cluster gwr to become gweyth 'thing
> wrought, work'.
> The verbal noun develops from *wregto- + il-; cf. sevel, leverel.
> This gives *gwrethyl.
> *Gwrethyl devolops in two ways. Either the rounded off-glide is lost
> but rounds the stressed syllable > gruthyl.
> Or the r is lost (cf. *gwreyth > gweyth)
I was under the impression that the communis opinio has it that C.
gweyth (along with its cognates W. gwaith and B. gwezh) derives from a
Proto-Celtic *wexta:, ultimately from the PIE *weg'h-, as seen in
Latin ueho, etc, and that the original sense was "course, period of
time", with a later semantic extension to "work". Am I behind the
times here? (I'm also aware of an alternate etymon in PIE *weik- "be
victorious", which brings in OI fecht, but IIRC this isn't well
supported by the Academy.)
More information about the Spellyans