[Spellyans] gawas 'to get'

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Thu Sep 8 20:05:07 IST 2011


Perhaps it might be sensible to allow both meneth and menedh and both genef and genev in the SWF. Then one of my serious objections would be gone.


On 2011 Gwn 8, at 19:54, Daniel Prohaska wrote:

> Which is exactly what I have been saying all along… This is why I think it’s problematic to codify a specific theory.
> The word-final <dh> can be pronounced /θ/ by rule, whereas if you write <th> in this position, those who want to pronounce /ð/ cannot predict where to do so, whether it’s correct or not. That’s all I’m saying. I’m not even arguing in favour of one of these theories, I would just like to give the learner/teacher/speaker an option to decide.  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20110908/8c42dae6/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list