[Spellyans] SWF (t) and Maga web site
njawilliams at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 17:36:48 IST 2012
We have been through all this many times. I don't object to <dh>, I object to <dh> after unstressed syllables as you know perfectly well.
My objection to the SWF is that it was not the work of linguists. I wasn't allowed in the room, nor was Michael. You weren't there. It was
a bad compromise devised by amateurs.
In the long term SWF/K or T at least in its present form has no future.
On 9 Aug 2012, at 17:13, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
> ‹dh› is legitimized through Lhuyd and over a century of use in Revived Cornish.
> ‹i› and ‹y› are used interchangeably in traditional Cornish, bringing some kind of order into the distribution is desirable.
> final ‹v› occurs in Lhuyd.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans