[Spellyans] Is there a future for the SWF?

Craig Weatherhill craig at agantavas.org
Tue May 15 09:22:08 IST 2012

I used the word "largely", having our 5th-10th century inscribed  
stones in mind.  Many of the names on them are British, albeit  
slightly altered to suit Latin orthography.  Taking that into  
consideration, they represent our only known written British.
Charles Thomas's book on Cornish and Welsh inscribed stone: "And Shall  
these Mute Stones Speak" (University of Wales Press 1994) is of great  
assistance in this subject.


On 15 Me 2012, at 08:56, Jon Mills wrote:.

> Spellings from British are conjectural; delete "largely". All  
> reconstructed phonologies of Cornish are conjectural.
> Ol an gwella,
> Jon
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Craig Weatherhill
>> Sent: 05/15/12 07:11 AM
>> To: Standard Cornish discussion list
>> Subject: Re: [Spellyans] Is there a future for the SWF?
>> I wonder if too much emphasis is being placed upon etymology.
>> Languages change over time, and spellings from British are largely
>> conjectural.  It seems to be pretty shaky ground at best.
>> Craig
> _____________________________________
> Dr. Jon Mills,
> University of Kent _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20120515/87f5b2fc/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list