[Spellyans] Is there a future for the SWF?
craig at agantavas.org
Sun May 20 12:25:59 IST 2012
The "agreement" was that, apart from official use and the earlier
stages of formal education, where the K form would be used,
traditional graphs had ABSOLUTE equality. That agreement has not been
On 20 Me 2012, at 12:04, Nicky Rowe wrote:
> I was talking about the SWF's traditional forms.
> If there were no place for traditional orthographic forms, Nicky,
> the Revival wouldn't have seen published over a million words in
> Cornish using them.
> Does anyone want to read the Bible in Cornish? They'll have
> traditional orthographic forms. How about Stevenson's classic
> "Treasure Island"? Yes, the AHG agreement made KK graphs "superior"
> and Traditional graphs "of not equal status" but people who are
> creating texts for the Revival are doing so using Traditional graphs.
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans