[Spellyans] Is there a future for the SWF?
daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Sun May 20 14:08:55 IST 2012
I agree in sentiment. The SWF is already much less hierarchic than KK was and slowly benefitting from it too.
On May 17, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Jon Mills wrote:
> Ewan wrote, "and the consequent conflicts in orthography and revival 'brands' dissuade folk from investing in a system that might well ultimately be ditched!" This is why we need a SWF that is less hierarchic, less prejudiced against those who prefer more traditional forms and has more genuine consensual support.
> Ol an gwella,
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: ewan wilson
>> Sent: 05/16/12 09:54 PM
>> To: Standard Cornish discussion list
>> Subject: Re: [Spellyans] Is there a future for the SWF?
>> I can see where Ray is coming from on this.
>> I do wonder if 'apathy' or possible waning enthusiasm for the language is
>> not down to the fact most learners are not high powered linguistics experts
>> and so much of the hotly argued minutiae of things like degrees of stress,
>> etc go right over their heads and the consequent conflicts in orthography
>> and revival 'brands' dissuade folk from investing in a system that might
>> well ultimately be ditched!
>> What is the feeling on the ground, I wonder?
> Dr. Jon Mills,
> University of Kent _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans