[Spellyans] Is there a future for the SWF?

Daniel Prohaska daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Sun May 20 14:08:55 IST 2012


I agree in sentiment. The SWF is already much less hierarchic than KK was and slowly benefitting from it too. 
Dan


On May 17, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Jon Mills wrote:

> Ewan wrote, "and the consequent conflicts in orthography and revival 'brands' dissuade folk from investing in a system that might well ultimately be ditched!" This is why we need a SWF that is less hierarchic, less prejudiced against those who prefer more traditional forms and has more genuine consensual support.
> Ol an gwella,
> Jon
> 
> 
>  
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: ewan wilson
>> Sent: 05/16/12 09:54 PM
>> To: Standard Cornish discussion list
>> Subject: Re: [Spellyans] Is there a future for the SWF?
>> 
>>  
>> I can see where Ray is coming from on this. 
>> I do wonder if 'apathy' or possible waning enthusiasm for the language is 
>> not down to the fact most learners are not high powered linguistics experts 
>> and so much of the hotly argued minutiae of things like degrees of stress, 
>> etc go right over their heads and the consequent conflicts in orthography 
>> and revival 'brands' dissuade folk from investing in a system that might 
>> well ultimately be ditched! 
>> What is the feeling on the ground, I wonder? 
>> 
>> Ewan. 
> 
> 
> 
> _____________________________________ 
> Dr. Jon Mills, 
> University of Kent _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20120520/a1517a69/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list