[Spellyans] Is there a future for the SWF?

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Mon May 21 10:34:41 IST 2012


On 21 May 2012, at 09:51, Jon Mills wrote:

> I agree with Nicky. If SWF/K is used for all official purposes, then SWF/T is of little use. Within this scheme, a SWF/T as "individual choice" is irrelevant since individuals can always choose to spell an way that suits them, be that KS, UC, UCR, their own personal orthography, etc.. And since SWF/T is, as Michael points out, so full of shortcomings, it is unlikely that many would adopt SWF/T as their individual choice.

The SWF/K has the same shortcomings.

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/





More information about the Spellyans mailing list