[Spellyans] Is there a future for the SWF?

Craig Weatherhill craig at agantavas.org
Mon May 21 10:49:13 IST 2012


Plus the alien graphs.

Craig


On 21 Me 2012, at 10:34, Michael Everson wrote:

> On 21 May 2012, at 09:51, Jon Mills wrote:
>
>> I agree with Nicky. If SWF/K is used for all official purposes,  
>> then SWF/T is of little use. Within this scheme, a SWF/T as  
>> "individual choice" is irrelevant since individuals can always  
>> choose to spell an way that suits them, be that KS, UC, UCR, their  
>> own personal orthography, etc.. And since SWF/T is, as Michael  
>> points out, so full of shortcomings, it is unlikely that many would  
>> adopt SWF/T as their individual choice.
>
> The SWF/K has the same shortcomings.
>
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net





More information about the Spellyans mailing list