daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Sat Nov 3 12:25:10 GMT 2012
I think there's a misunderstanding here somewhere in the thread….
Both forms are historical in that they are attested and were used. It remains to decide which form is the "etymological" one, i.e. which passed through the sound changes regularly.
On Nov 3, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Hedley Climo wrote:
> In UCR (NJAW 2006), we find:
> cavalier. marhek, -hogyon
> chevalier. marhak, -hogyon
> ?marhegyon seems not to be included at all.
> Eddie Climo
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans