[Spellyans] 2013 SWF Review
daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Fri Apr 19 12:09:27 IST 2013
2.) ‹i› graph used inappropriately in prefixes and suffixes;
This point requires examples and explanation where and why the ‹i› graph is ‘used inappropriately’ and what inappropriate use of ‹i› constitutes. In such this point is closely related to the question of the rules of distribution of the ‹y› v. ‹i› graphs. Please elaborate!
Again, it is not clear by listing this one word what is meant by ‘aesthetics’ and which kind of aesthetic considerations come into play in the question of reviewing the SWF and standardising written Cornish. Please elaborate!
On Apr 18, 2013, at 11:44 PM, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
> Sorry for misrepresenting… Still have KS1 in my head… ;-)
> On Apr 18, 2013, at 11:00 PM, Michael Everson wrote:
>> On 18 Apr 2013, at 20:00, Daniel Prohaska <daniel at ryan-prohaska.com> wrote:
>>> I should say the SWF does as best it can by giving ‹mynn› only, i.e. with a short vowel and no pre-occluded SWF/L variant **mydn. Of course KS has the advantage of a diacritical mark to indicate shortness of the vowel by writing ‹mìn›.
>> This is not correct. In the first place, KS doesn't use ‹ì› at all; it uses ‹y›. In the second, KS has a simple rule which is based on the SWF rules. In stressed monosyllables, ‹i› is used for [iː] and ‹y› is used for [ɪ] and ‹nn› is only used where words pre-occlude in the revived language. Thus KS writes ‹myn› and ‹jyn› and no one can get confused and say *mydn or *jydn for these words.
>> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>> Spellyans mailing list
>> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans