[Spellyans] 2013 SWF Review
clive.baker at gmail.com
Fri Apr 19 14:31:39 IST 2013
Think Id agree with you Craig... theres none so deaf as they who wont
listen... and as far as the rest of this discussion is concerned, I
appreciate that linguists are finding it difficult to follow any of the
points... how do think us "normal" people feel?... yet our opinion is
equally important... bit like playing double blind man's bluff.
enjoy your day
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Craig Weatherhill <craig at agantavas.org>wrote:
> Incorrect. I think about KS1 quite a lot, as I liked it immensely.
> Current KS had little choice but to follow and inform SWF (or, at least,
> make a concerted attempt to do so). If it were not for that reality, I'd
> prefer KS1. I f some ears have still lost the power of hearing after this
> year's review, I believe I'd adopt KS1, and move on with that.
> On 2013 Ebr 19, at 13:56, Michael Everson wrote:
> > On 18 Apr 2013, at 22:44, Daniel Prohaska <daniel at ryan-prohaska.com>
> >> Sorry for misrepresenting… Still have KS1 in my head… ;-)
> > Nobody has thought about KS1 since the publication of the SWF five years
> ago. May I invite you to read sections 0.1 through 0.4.3 in Desky Kernowek?
> > Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spellyans mailing list
> > Spellyans at kernowek.net
> > http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans