[Spellyans] in me, in you, etc.

Nicholas Williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Sun Apr 21 16:55:18 IST 2013


If Gendall does not consider it a pattern to follow, why does he use it at all?

On 21 Apr 2013, at 15:48, Chris Parkinson wrote:

>  I mention that it occurs in a lesson on imperatives as opposed to a lesson on inflected prepositions, which information you did not give. Dick , as you point out, did not include it in his paradigm of  ‘in’ as he does not consider it as a pattern to follow any more than you do.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20130421/5f9e2808/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list