[Spellyans] in me, in you, etc.

Chris Parkinson brynbow at btinternet.com
Sun Apr 21 17:04:11 IST 2013


It happened to be in an example he chose to demonstrate the imperative.

 

From: Spellyans [mailto:spellyans-bounces at kernowek.net] On Behalf Of
Nicholas Williams
Sent: 21 April 2013 16:55
To: Standard Cornish discussion list
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] in me, in you, etc.

 

If Gendall does not consider it a pattern to follow, why does he use it at
all?

 

On 21 Apr 2013, at 15:48, Chris Parkinson wrote:





 I mention that it occurs in a lesson on imperatives as opposed to a lesson
on inflected prepositions, which information you did not give. Dick , as you
point out, did not include it in his paradigm of  'in' as he does not
consider it as a pattern to follow any more than you do.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20130421/4a4928a6/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list