[Spellyans] cledh etc
daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Sat Jan 12 20:48:31 GMT 2013
Giben the evidence I do't think <cleudh> is conlangy at all. This umbrella graph means /œ/ and /e/ anyway... the spelling is attested, albeit in a place name.
Sent from my iPhone
On 12.01.2013, at 20:29, Nicholas Williams <njawilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
> We're trying to revive a language as close to the form of it when it was spoken.
> We should therefore spell as far as possible as the scribes did, not according to our
> own possibly mistaken understanding.
> Otherwise we get a conlang.
> On 12 Jan 2013, at 18:26, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
>> That may be so, but it's only your opinion. Others don't see it as a mistake.
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans