[Spellyans] cledh etc

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Sun Jan 13 17:08:40 GMT 2013


"The SWF" is a specification. It does not have consensus. People may or may not achieve consensus.

We were never asked if we agreed with the "etymological principle" and in practice it can be seen that it is a failure.

On 12 Jan 2013, at 14:07, Daniel Prohaska <daniel at ryan-prohaska.com> wrote:

> This principle does not appear to be the consensus within the SWF.
> Dan
> 
> 
> On Jan 12, 2013, at 2:03 PM, Nicholas Williams wrote:
> 
>> No etymological spellings! Follow the texts.
>> 
>> On 12 Jan 2013, at 12:40, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
>> 
>>> What do you all think?
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spellyans mailing list
>> Spellyans at kernowek.net
>> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/





More information about the Spellyans mailing list