[Spellyans] cledh etc
linusband at gmail.com
Thu Jan 17 12:35:04 GMT 2013
Even though if we agree that the unrounding already took place in the 15th
century, we cannot conclude that the SWF should therefore contain -e-
instead -eu-, because Ken George aims to revive the language as spoken
around 1500. What we are forgetting is that Ken George (and surely others)
is convinced that the unrounding had not taken place yet around 1500, but
The fact is that there is a part of the revival that would like to
pronounce old */ø/ as [e(ː)] and another part that prefers the older sound
[ø(ː)], and the SWF has to accommodate both.
2013/1/17 Christian Semmens <christian.semmens at gmail.com>
> From the evidence relating to cledh, would it suggest that the front
> rounded vowel sound in Cornish was in retreat in the early 15th century.
> If that were so, would it not be fair to say that the SWF etymological
> spelling is helpful to *pronunciation* only if you wish to target a
> projected mediaeval pronunciation and as such more relevant to old Cornish
> than the period the revival professes to be interested in?
> On 17 January 2013 09:39, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com> wrote:
>> On 17 Jan 2013, at 08:28, "Hewitt, Stephen" <s.hewitt at unesco.org> wrote:
>> > Which I think is wonderful.
>> > But in this group, further changes appear to be being discussed…
>> Can you be more specific?
>> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>> Spellyans mailing list
>> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans