[Spellyans] SWF Y (was Re: Falmouth)
philip.newton at gmail.com
Wed Apr 30 07:16:47 IST 2014
On 29 April 2014 23:04, Janice Lobb <janicelobb at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there any point in
> distributing publications in spellings we are no longer using? You know our
> historical problems with spellings as mobile as quicksands.
I was reminded of this when seeing some recent publications in SWF1
now that SWF2 has(?) come out.
But I'm glad that among the recommendations for SWF2, one of them was
for the spelling to stay stable for a longer period this time (than
the five years before the mandated review).
More information about the Spellyans