[Spellyans] yn udnyk 'only'
Daniel Prohaska
daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Thu May 1 15:42:13 BST 2014
My mistake. Thanks for checking...
Sent from my iPhone
> On 01.05.2014, at 14:36, Nicholas Williams <njawilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I don't think so.
> The full quotation is:
>
> arluth ple then alemma
> thy'n the gemeres trygfa
> na theffo den vyth gynen
> ha pygyn dev gallosek
> del esen agan vnnek
> ha na moy gor na benen RD 2391-96
>
> Lord, where shall we go hence
> to acquire for ourselves a habitiation,
> so that no man may come with us,
> and we will pray to mighty God
> as we are eleven of us
> and no more, man or woman?
>
> vnnek clearly means 'eleven' not 'sole, solitary'.
> George makes the same mistake in his 2009 dictionary,
> who follows Pryce A a 3.
>
> Nicholas
>
>> On 1 May 2014, at 13:03, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
>>
>> There is also ‹vnnek› at RD.2395
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20140501/b14da923/attachment.htm>
More information about the Spellyans
mailing list