[Spellyans] yn udnyk 'only'

Daniel Prohaska daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Thu May 1 15:42:13 IST 2014


My mistake. Thanks for checking...

Sent from my iPhone

> On 01.05.2014, at 14:36, Nicholas Williams <njawilliams at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I don't think so. 
> The full quotation is: 
> 
> arluth ple then alemma
> thy'n the gemeres trygfa
> na theffo den vyth gynen
> ha pygyn dev gallosek
> del esen agan vnnek
> ha na moy gor na benen RD 2391-96
> 
> Lord, where shall we go hence
> to acquire for ourselves a habitiation, 
> so that no man may come with us,
> and we will pray to mighty God
> as we are eleven of us
> and no more, man or woman?
> 
> vnnek clearly means 'eleven' not 'sole, solitary'.
> George makes the same mistake in his 2009 dictionary,
> who follows Pryce A a 3.
> 
> Nicholas
> 
>> On 1 May 2014, at 13:03, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
>> 
>> There is also ‹vnnek› at RD.2395 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20140501/b14da923/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list