njawilliams at gmail.com
Sun Nov 1 16:29:38 GMT 2015
I can think of only a few examples more: kê 'go' ~ ke 'hedge'; pò 'if' ~ po < bo subjunctive of bos; te 'thou' ~ tê 'tea'. The use of the diacritic here is like French a 'has' ~ à 'to'; ou 'or' ~ où 'where?' I certainly have never found it arduous or irksome. Although I always use diacritics when writing KS, others may prefer to omit them in certain cases. The advantage of diacritics is that they facilitate the reading of written Cornish. KS cùssul is unambiguous. SWF cusul/kusul is not.
Notice that I am writing this on my iPhone and have no difficulty with diacritics.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 1 Samh 2015, at 15:19, Ray Chubb <ray at spyrys.org> wrote:
> I have to admit that it is only recently that I have studied in depth where one should apply the accents in KS.
> Having read the section in Desky Kernowek, I think I understand the rules now and there is one case for applying accents which I would query. We are informed that a circumflex accent ( ˄) is used to show when two words have the same spelling and pronunciation but have different meanings, e.g. êth (went) and eth (eight) and dâ (good)and da (variant of 'dha').
> We do not yet have a full dictionary in KS so I don't know how many examples this rule is likely to throw up. I believe that most regular users of Cornish will understand that a different word is involved from the context in which the word is written. To show different words in this way by a circumflex is, I believe, unnecessary and only increases the number of accents that must be inserted in order to write KS.
> A quicker way of inserting accents has recently been explained to me but, nevertheless, it still takes more time to write a document in KS than it would in Unified or SWF.
> Ray Chubb
> Agan Tavas web site: www.agantavas.com
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans