[Spellyans] Excel SWF-KK-Traditional Corpus-WIP

A. J. Trim ajtrim at msn.com
Tue Feb 2 01:25:15 GMT 2016


Sorry. I meant kittens.

Regards,

Andrew J. Trim




On 02/02/16 01:20, A. J. Trim wrote:
> I have had a good look through this list. I cannot see any major errors.
> You have lakca but Traditional Cornish favoured lacka.
> Are Ucrayn and vodca any more traditional than Ukrayn and vodka?
> Is there any point in using "Traditional Graphs" when they don't match 
> Traditional Cornish, or unlikely to have occurred in Traditional Cornish?
> You have lycclod, flyccra, pyccla, racca, tobacco, tyccly but I do not 
> remember the SWF allowing cc.
> Koca-Kola is not logical. Is this a trademark? An Internet search 
> shows some puppies!
> Kabmbrodn appears to be a Late form. Should it be included?
> Upper-case K is not being converted to C.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Andrew J. Trim
>
>
>
>
> On 31/01/16 19:07, Harry 'Double-H' Hawkey wrote:
>> Anyone care to take a look at my initial attempt at a SWF k/hw to SWF 
>> c/wh conversion?  See if you can spot any glaring errors...
>>
>> By the way, it converted 'distruksyon' to 'distruxyon' - is that 
>> supposed to be correct? Because it certainly doesn't look right to 
>> me...what exactly is the rule for ks-->x?  I notice the trad glossary 
>> gives the other form, 'distruyans'.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spellyans mailing list
>> Spellyans at kernowek.net
>> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20160202/be29d52e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Spellyans mailing list