[Spellyans] Excel SWF-KK-Traditional Corpus-WIP

[Michael Everson]

On 30 Jan 2016, at 15:39, Daniel Prohaska <daniel at ryan-prohaska.com> wrote:

> As far as the SWF is concerned, **Cammbron, if it were thus written, would not necessarily imply **Cabmbron. Although this would be a useful feature, there is no one-to-one correspondence between ‹mm›, ‹nn› and their pre-occluded variants ‹bm›, ‹dn›.

There is in a genuinely *inclusive* orthography. But the SWF fails in this respect. 

Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/