On 4 Jul 2008, at 07:45, Michael Everson wrote: > I guess we have > a minimal pair in <dâ> [dæ:] 'good', <da> [d@] > 'to'. I must be missing something: Nance 1938 gives 3 English meanings for K. 'da' .. . . = good .. . . see 'dha' [=S.'thy'] .. . . = fallow-deer NJAW 2006 gives S. 'to' = K. 'dhe' Where does K. 'da' = S. ' to' come from? Eddie