[Spellyans] RLC <h> for <gh>
owen.e.cook at gmail.com
Wed Jun 25 20:03:03 BST 2008
No I can't, which is why I think it's really /e:T/. In any event,
<'eth> is better than <yeth>.
2008/6/25 nicholas williams <njawilliams at gmail.com>:
> We cannot be sure. Can you think of any parallel?
> On 25 Jun 2008, at 18:52, Owen Cook wrote:
>> I think so too Nicholas, but can we be sure of this? Can we actually
>> exclude the possibility of /ejT/?
More information about the Spellyans