weatherhill at freenet.co.uk
Fri Jun 27 17:53:33 BST 2008
Why ever not? I have a first edition here - still have a very soft spot
for his orthography, diacriticals and all. Wouldn't it be nice to
produce a 1904 Handbook - and a new one. Just a thought.
Michael Everson wrote:
> At 11:00 -0400 2008-06-27, stinney at sas.upenn.edu wrote:
>> You can Jenner (not Keigwin) and several other interesting things at:
> I wonder if Jenner should be reprinted.
More information about the Spellyans