[Spellyans] SWF questionable wordforms

Daniel Prohaska daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Wed Sep 17 13:43:24 BST 2008

By SWF rules we ought to write <faladow>, and since this is also attested
it's fine. I see no need to change it.




From: nicholas williams
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 10:49 AM


But note he also writes <faladov> at BM 812 & 1820 and faladov occurs at BK


The spelling <falladow> occurs 25 times in the Ordinalia, BK and CW.

Jordan writes <falladowe> five times.


If we were going by attestation we would write <falladow> not <faladow>.





On 17 Sep 2008, at 08:49, Jon Mills wrote:

Ton, Rad. (1504): falladow; feladow


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20080917/a17690b9/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list