weatherhill at freenet.co.uk
Tue Apr 7 12:22:06 BST 2009
Have Trond's rulings ever been written down and circulated? If not,
then they count for nothing and are merely hearsay. We cannot
progress on such a basis. Also, if they have not been officially
recorded, why not?
On 7 Ebr 2009, at 12:11, nicholas williams wrote:
> KK as the basis? This is the first I have heard of such a ruling.
> The Commission's report said nothing of the kind.
> KD was to be the basis.
> On 6 Apr 2009, at 23:42, Michael Everson wrote:
>>> Now this is not in the spec but Trond’s ruling was that the KK
>>> form is to be taken as the basis and if it is found linguistically
>>> faulty or inauthentic, or in violation of the SWF specification,
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans