[Spellyans] 'up, upwards'
craig at agantavas.org
Thu Jan 22 19:32:43 GMT 2009
Will we then have: in bann, in badn, in mann (and presumably) in madn
(even though I don't recall its attestation)?
On 22 Gen 2009, at 19:11, Michael Everson wrote:
> On 22 Jan 2009, at 18:34, nicholas williams wrote:
>> Why is in bann not to be pronounced in badn?
> Not sure I follow you. "in bann" may be pronounced as [ban] or
> [badn], depending on dialect preference, and "in badn" may be
> pronounced as [badn] or [ban].
>> It is clear that in ban without pre-occlusion was attested.
> Are you saying that in dialects that pre-occlude, "in bàn" also
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans