[Spellyans] 'up, upwards'

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Thu Jan 22 21:37:05 GMT 2009

On 22 Jan 2009, at 19:32, Craig Weatherhill wrote:

> Will we then have: in bann, in badn, in mann (and presumably) in  
> madn (even though I don't recall its attestation)?

At a minimum we'd have in bann, in badn, in màn.

More information about the Spellyans mailing list