everson at evertype.com
Sat Nov 28 20:43:51 GMT 2009
On 28 Nov 2009, at 20:12, nicholas williams wrote:
> With tycky Duw we have a plural tycky Duwas.
We also have tyckyas Duw.
> To be consistent ought we say eskelly grehynas?
It seems to me that we must indeed have a way of saying both "bat" and
askel grohen, a leather-wing, seems to say 'bat' to me.
eskelly crohen, leather-wings, seems fine for 'bats'.
KK is using this anyway (as askell-groghen, eskelli-kroghen); George
takes sgelli grehan as a plural,and points to Breton askell-groc'hen.
It seems likely that "askel grohen" should indeed be used as a
Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
More information about the Spellyans