[Spellyans] Holyer an Gof 2010

nicholas williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Wed Aug 18 14:53:55 BST 2010

As far as the judges of Holyer an Gof are concerned it would seem that  
orthography trumps quality.
The two permitted orthographies are KK (which was rightly rejected by  
the Commission) and the SWF.
Neither of the two winning volumes seems to be of outstanding value.
Moreover the KK dictionary has changed the phonology of KK and in so  
doing has rendered the orthography wholly unphonemic—
which we were told was the sine qua non of KK . Not that any such  
changes will affect anybody's pronunciation; since all speakers of
KK actually speak UC (plus a few errors of their own, e.g. privv  
'worm', bizz 'world').

The SWF on the other hand in both its forms is a political compromise,  
which is as inauthentic as it is incoherent. It is unlikely to last  
long—at least in its present form.
The revival needs to be built on scholarly criteria, not political  
What a missed opportunity!

Nicholas Williams

On 18 Est 2010, at 08:41, Nige Martin wrote:

> This email is not worthy of publishing on the list, it is for the  
> moderator's consideration.
> I have to agree, the decision concerning the Cornish Language  
> entries does appear a little strange but, I do not know what  
> criteria was used during the judging process.  To Michael, Craig and  
> others that produce KS material; don't let 'them' grind you down,  
> please continue with your endeavours.  Although I do not possess the  
> capacity to influence the masses, I am using word-of-mouth to  
> promote KS within my community.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20100818/175a88fe/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list