[Spellyans] Diacritics and their necessity
eddie_climo at yahoo.co.uk
Tue Feb 1 19:06:29 GMT 2011
No, Michael. You may have proposed those things in 2008, but they were never ratified by the membership of Spellyans.
Until that process has been undertaken by a vote taken after full discussion, there is no KS; there is only a proposal for what you think KS ought to be.
Neither Michael nor Nicholas nor any other individuals in this group are empowered to decide unilaterally what KS will be.
Only the membership of this group can do so. If that were not so, then this whole UdnFormScrefys and Spellyans process has been a sham, a mere talking shop.
Eddie Foirbeis Climo
- -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- -
Dres ethom akennow byner re bo lyeshes
Accenti non multiplicandi praeter necessitatem
On 2011 Whe 1, at 18:18, Michael Everson wrote:
> The core decisions about KS were taken in 2008. One of these was that diacritical marks would be used. Another was that we would not make them "optional" in some circumstances
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans