[Spellyans] SWF (t) and Maga web site

Nicholas Williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Thu Aug 9 17:36:48 BST 2012

We have been through all this many times. I don't object to <dh>, I object to <dh> after unstressed syllables as you know perfectly well.
My objection to the SWF is that it was not the work of linguists. I wasn't allowed in the room, nor was Michael. You weren't there. It was
a bad compromise devised by amateurs.
In the long term SWF/K or T at least in its present form has no future.


On 9 Aug 2012, at 17:13, Daniel Prohaska wrote:

> ‹dh› is legitimized  through Lhuyd and over a century of use in Revived Cornish.
> ‹i› and ‹y› are used interchangeably in traditional Cornish, bringing some kind of order into the distribution is desirable. 
> final ‹v› occurs in Lhuyd.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20120809/f82d7bb2/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list