daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Wed Oct 31 17:59:10 GMT 2012
I don't think it's ideal to have two spelling of what is essentially the same ending, pronounced the same. There's a wide consensus to spell this <-ek>, I think that's what we ought to do.
Sent from my iPhone
On 31.10.2012, at 17:26, Michael Everson <everson at evertype.com> wrote:
> On 31 Oct 2012, at 15:33, Nicholas Williams wrote:
>> I think the revived language should allow both, and spell them marhogyon, marhegyon.
> Since we have a rule regarding the spelling of the final syllable of the singular with plurals like this, the permitted spellings would be marhek, marhegyon; marhak, marhogyon.
> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans