[Spellyans] in me, in you, etc.
brynbow at btinternet.com
Sun Apr 21 17:04:11 BST 2013
It happened to be in an example he chose to demonstrate the imperative.
From: Spellyans [mailto:spellyans-bounces at kernowek.net] On Behalf Of
Sent: 21 April 2013 16:55
To: Standard Cornish discussion list
Subject: Re: [Spellyans] in me, in you, etc.
If Gendall does not consider it a pattern to follow, why does he use it at
On 21 Apr 2013, at 15:48, Chris Parkinson wrote:
I mention that it occurs in a lesson on imperatives as opposed to a lesson
on inflected prepositions, which information you did not give. Dick , as you
point out, did not include it in his paradigm of 'in' as he does not
consider it as a pattern to follow any more than you do.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Spellyans