[Spellyans] cledh etc

Nicholas Williams njawilliams at gmail.com
Sat Jan 12 19:29:43 GMT 2013

We're trying to revive a language as close to the form of it when it was spoken. 
We should therefore spell as far as possible as the scribes did, not according to our
own possibly mistaken understanding. 
Otherwise we get a conlang.

On 12 Jan 2013, at 18:26, Daniel Prohaska wrote:

> That may be so, but it's only your opinion. Others don't see it as a mistake. 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20130112/ea527ccd/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list