[Spellyans] cledh etc

Daniel Prohaska daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Sat Jan 12 20:48:31 GMT 2013

Giben the evidence I do't think <cleudh> is conlangy at all. This umbrella graph means /œ/ and /e/ anyway... the spelling is attested, albeit in a place name.

Sent from my iPhone

On 12.01.2013, at 20:29, Nicholas Williams <njawilliams at gmail.com> wrote:

> We're trying to revive a language as close to the form of it when it was spoken. 
> We should therefore spell as far as possible as the scribes did, not according to our
> own possibly mistaken understanding. 
> Otherwise we get a conlang.
> On 12 Jan 2013, at 18:26, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
>> That may be so, but it's only your opinion. Others don't see it as a mistake. 
> _______________________________________________
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> http://kernowek.net/mailman/listinfo/spellyans_kernowek.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20130112/fda39c42/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list