[Spellyans] cleudh etc

Daniel Prohaska daniel at ryan-prohaska.com
Mon Jan 14 17:18:12 GMT 2013


I completely agree with what you wrote below. This is how I try to proceed with my dictionary. 


On Jan 14, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Hewitt, Stephen wrote:

> Cornish texts are of course the primary basis. The point is that there are not enough of them. The fact that the word cleudh does not happen to occur in Middle Cornish texts does not mean that it would not have had an /œ/ vowel in that period. If you rely on “tota cornicitas” and that only, you are bound to end up with an unholy mix of forms from different periods mascarading as if they belonged to one and the same period.
> If, in addition, you want your orthography to serve two or three different periods of the language (e.g. Middle, Tudor, Late Cornish) so as to cater to all sensibilities with a minimum of differences in writing, the only solution is to adopt an etymologizing orthography, which in turn, in the case of sparsely documented Cornish, means making an educated etymological guess from time to time in order to fill in the gaps. The alternative is a mixed salad with synchronic authenticity in no period at all.
> Steve Hewitt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kernowek.net/pipermail/spellyans_kernowek.net/attachments/20130114/ced6e2b7/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Spellyans mailing list