[Spellyans] Suffix -yeth in KS

Michael Everson everson at evertype.com
Tue Jun 4 10:21:15 BST 2013

On 3 Jun 2013, at 19:13, Craig Weatherhill <craig at agantavas.org> wrote:

> The Review, like the AHG, doesn't strike me as being well organized or thought out.  

No, it doesn't. I say this as someone who has worked in ISO standardization for over a decade and a half. There are tried-and-true procedures for disposing of 

> There's a list of relevant points on the MAGA site of you know where to find it, but that doesn't give any real detail of the points being raised.  Poor, so far.

As I understand that list is basically the titles given by the submitters to their suggestions for change to the SWF. On the Corpus group we were asked to respond to this list. I said that if I were to respond professionally I would need to see the entire argument made by the submitters, not just an unedited dump of the titles. 

On 3 Jun 2013, at 19:25, Daniel Prohaska <daniel at ryan-prohaska.com> wrote:

> I asked Jenefer about it and she said a more complete list of issues will be put together. On the other hand, absolutely nothing is discussed in the corpus-group forum, which is sad considering the importance of the SWF Review. 

What's the point of discussing anything on that forum? Who listens? Who decides? 


More information about the Spellyans mailing list