[Spellyans] SWF review results.
craig at agantavas.org
Sat Apr 5 16:21:49 BST 2014
I think the facts about respondents need to be formally challenged. That, and the non-publication/circulation of vital elements of the Review does not fill one with either confidence or trust.
On 2014 Ebr 5, at 12:54, Daniel Prohaska wrote:
> So, with you and me suggesting solutions with diacritics there are already twice as many respondents making this an issue than is being claimed!!!
> On Apr 5, 2014, at 11:13 AM, Michael Everson wrote:
>> On 5 Apr 2014, at 10:09, Daniel Prohaska <daniel at ryan-prohaska.com> wrote:
>>> I cannot imagine it to be true that there was only one respondent on the issue of diacritics. I know I proposed several diacritic solutions, I'm sure Michael would have, too. Anybody else?
>> There is no way of telling, as, despite repeated requests for openness, the source material was not made available to experts.
>> Michael Everson * http://www.evertype.com/
>> Spellyans mailing list
>> Spellyans at kernowek.net
> Spellyans mailing list
> Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans