[Spellyans] Problems in revived Cornish
kevin.blackburn1 at ntlworld.com
Wed Nov 1 15:28:08 GMT 2017
Couldn't agree with this more. Since picking up Morton Nance in 1978 and availing myself of various UC materials, the language seems to have gone through a self-destructive period, largely by some (well meaning?) people approaching the continued revival as a ConLangs exercise!
I must say, despite Cornish being my favourite Celtic Language, this has been very depressing!
eMail: kevin.blackburn1 at ntlworld.com
Please consider the environment before printing this eMail – try re-cycling your clutter
From: Spellyans [mailto:spellyans-bounces at kernowek.net] On Behalf Of Ray Chubb
Sent: 01 November 2017 09:15
To: Standard Cornish discussion list <spellyans at kernowek.net>
Subject: [Spellyans] Problems in revived Cornish
If Tom Trethewey and others wish to know what has gone wrong in at least one part of the revival over the last 30 years I suggest they read my booklet 'Thoughts on Cornish Today' which is free to download
It think it is pretty clear that excessive invention in spelling has led to a similar situation in grammar and vocabulary. It's not a position that should be defended, especially on this list.
Oll an gwella,
Spellyans mailing list
Spellyans at kernowek.net
More information about the Spellyans